Monday, March 16, 2015

Resigned Dilling in a letter: – It shows how far NFF are willing to go – Dagbladet.no

(Dagbladet): After NFF lost trial against Guttorm Dilling, is not the two parties agreed.

The online newspaper showed Monday until the two parties proposed (see fact box).

From Dilling page proposal is either a severance package of nine years or an unconditional severance package of four years, which means that Dilling to retain NFF salary even if he finds another job in this four-year period.

This can NFF completely unreasonable. They have come with what they call a “generously counteroffer” (see fact box), without having been heard.

– chilling

Now football federation lawyer Nicolay Skarning hard out:

– It is a chilling high demands they have made. I have never experienced such a lack of will to resolve a case, says Skarning Dagbladet, and enumerates the offer NFF has made.

– I regret. It is totally unacceptable to accept any more, he said.

There has been dialogue between the two parties today – and those of the NFF (pictured) is on Dilling table until at 4:00 p.m. today.

Determines he not on the hours – it goes against appeal case in the Court of Appeal.

– How do you perceive the counterparty in case?

– Nilsen is a driven and accomplished lawyer, but Dilling has locked up completely. The question in this case was whether (Per-Mathias) Høgmo or Dilling should decide who is in the national team support. Here we must stand on our site and in this process proves Dilling that he lacks the interoperability that is necessary to work in the support, said NFF attorney.



Totally disagrees

When Dagbladet says Dilling lawyer Bjorn Fred Borg Nilsen about NFF strong wording – he breaks out:

– Have they also told you that he now also been dismissed by a change notice on Friday? They have thus formally said he raised from the position and offered him the position they fall tried to demote him in. And in the middle of a process where the issue of the autonomy and treatment around the resettlement is not legally binding, says Nilsen Dagbladet.

Dagbladet gets confirmed that changing the termination is completed. That means in principle that NFF refuses Dilling to return to the job managing leader of the A-team.

The letter is changing dismissal justified by poor collaboration ability, Dilling

outcomes against NFF and associated think it is unlikely that Dilling align themselves HØGMO requirements.

It’s Kjetil Siem who signed the letter. Dagbladet has tried to make contact with NFF lawyer Nicolay Skarning again, no luck.

– They claim therefore now that there are reasonable grounds to terminate Guttorm so it is today. This although Guttorm has said he still wants to move back in the position he had and was willing to abide by NFF topping. Dilling want to look forward, and do not have problems to deal with either the chief or other in the support, says Dilling lawyer.

He is frustrated NFF handling the case:
– That they then still goes to the crotch kicking he shows how far they are willing to go to keep Guttorm away job has the right to be in. It’s pretty brutal, and, in my mind not the way to treat a loyal worker. I reacted strongly to the NFF has leaked our proposals to the press.



Fearing a future without jobs

The reason they offered a solution with two possible severance packages according Dilling lawyer that the client fears for job offers in the coming years.

Dilling turn 58 this summer, and the lawyer explains that their thought is it is not unreasonable that he secured income until retirement .

– As the district court was clear in so it NFF alone, not Guttorm, who has blamed the situation that has arisen. It is at best uncertain whether he gets a new job. He has been named in the media as one that has drawn the employer to court. We ask for the severance package as a security, it is not Dilling (who won the trial) that should be left with no risk, explains Fred Borg Nilsen.

The lawyer should talk with Guttorm Dilling – but it does not seem like there will be any solution today.

In this case, the case goes to the Court of Appeal.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment