Were slaughtered in Football Evening: – We used whatsoever big screen – TV 2

The ball had been in the web, the players were back at the halfway line and Sandefjord thought they had put it 2-0.

But then changed judge Ola Hobber Nilsen himself and the goal was annulled. And instead of that Sandefjord secured the three points they desperately needed, offset Tromsø few minutes before the end.

– This stinks, said a highly available Lars Bohinen after the game.

Impetuous discussion in Football Night

The reason Lars BOHIN strong reaction was that Judge team reportedly had seen situation on the big screen and then changed his mind – after the home fans had also seen the situation and highlighted their grievances. According Bohinen the referee should have explained the choice with a “bad gut feeling” after the game.

The decision did Jesper Mathisen to race in Football Night.

– We have now seen the situation 50 times and still can not see if it is offside. What happens is that Judge and Linesman approves goal and running back up to the halfway line. Then comes the fourth official, as guaranteed’ve seen this on the big screen, and they hear the crowd start shouting. Therefore reverses the decision. They can not withstand the 5,000 people on Alfheim shouts that it is a wrong decision, he thundered.

– First look no decision gal out and secondly you can not use the video to determine this. I feel so incredibly sorry for Lars Bohinen. Here ends by taking a totally lousy decision, continued Mathisen.

Ole Martin Årst specified that Ola Hobber Nilsen, via Per Ivar Staberg, had given notified that the big screen was never used but was more concerned with “gut feeling” that Bohinen had referred to.

– It just gets too thin, he said.

official strikes back

According to Ola Hobber Nilsen himself, has TV2′s expert panel completely misunderstood the situation.

– What really happened, Ola?

– The ball enters the goal, and the first thing I think is it smells offside. I have communication with the judge team and we are becoming convinced that this was a wrong decision. It is also so that we can reverse the decision until the next kick the ball is taken. I want to emphasize that none of us at any time use their big screen. The only thing we could pick up was discontent from the audience, but it’s a perfectly normal part of life, he said by phone Sunday evening.

– As the votes are not saying that fourth official saw the situation on the big screen and communicated this on to you?

– No. Fourth Judge was not at any time involved in the decision. This decision was taken by

judge and his assistants and nobody else.

– What about the BOHIN alleging gut feeling?

– I feel it is taken completely out of context. As I said earlier started this with a feeling that we had landed on the wrong decision, and I therefore wanted to assure the quality of the decision with my team. We discussed it and decided that it was offside.

– It is alleged also that you, you did influence of the audience reacted, and that perhaps you felt it was substance in their reaction as they had Set the replay on the big screen. Do you have any thoughts on that?

– I can only refute strongly. All we want to do is land on the correct decision. I have not seen the situation properly in hindsight and therefore dare not comment yet. We are humbled that we may have done wrong, and it’s a pity if we took a wrong decision, but we did not see the situation on the big screen and we let us not be influenced by the audience.

Watch the whole situation here: