TV2 Manager onto Rekdal: – As low I did not think he would sink – VG

TV 2 turn back after Kjetil Rekdal criticized the station’s reporter on the fly. Vålerenga coach suggested that bosses “were behind the question” around former bickering with Sogndal coach Eirik Bakke.

Vålerenga coach called also reporting by Anne Sturød “embarrassing bad journalism.”

the initiative will channel editorial director, Eystein Thue, to react.

– Kjetil have every right to think the question is embarrassing and bad journalism. There he must say on the air as well. But to say that Anne is equipped with screenwriters from their chief – so low I did not think he would sink, says editorial director of TV 2, Eystein Thue, told Dagbladet.

Thue call commentary a classic example of hersketeknikk, and claims he would like to see Rekdal say the same for Jon Hartvig Børrestad or Davy Wathne.

When the newspaper tried to get in touch with Rekdal Sunday night, he did not want to answer any more questions on the matter. He considered himself as “finished media for the day.” Monday morning has Vålerenga coach not answered VG inquiry.

BEEN WITH YOU THIS? Rekdal after Sogndal loss: – Embarrassing

Asked about the ancient feud

THANKS FOR THE GAME: –

Kjetil Rekdal and Eirik Bakke shook my hand yesterday right after the game.

Christian Blom NTB scanpix

it was yesterday before the game that TV2 reporter Anne Sturød took up again the old feud between the then Aalesund coach Kjetil Rekdal and Fire player Eirik Bakke.

the two ended up in a fierce war of words for openly at Brann Stadium in 2009. Ground believed that one of Rekdals players filmed. The then AaFK coach was of a different opinion, fired up and served a juicy tirade toward Ground:

READ THIS? Cursed Rekdal to Ground in 2009: – Ha you away, your alkis!

– You do not say of his movies when he films so shut up. Shut up and have you away! Look at the TV and shut the fuck up. Shut up, I can not bear to talk to you. Get away your alkis! Go and drink more now! Rekdal promise as a hand in the air to show that he drank from a bottle.

Irritated “embarrassing journalism»

ANGRY: –

The then Aalesund coach Kjetil Rekdal in interview zone after the quarrel between he and Eirik Bakke at Brann Stadium in 2009.

Hallgeir Vågenes VG

Sturød would last to know what conditions a was between the two – as they first met as coaches. Sogndal coach Bakke said on his part said that he was finished with the case and that there was no “battle between Bakke and Rekdal.” VIF coach chose another appearance. He rolled his eyes and shook his head of TV2 reporter’s question with the two coaches on the fly.

– I think it’s embarrassing bad journalism. It can bring to your bosses who have asked you ask about it, said Rekdal.

READ ALSO : Riise compared with Northug

TV 2 : Relevance to take up before the game

VG was Monday in contact with Davy Wathne. He did not want to comment. Dagbladet was also in contact with Vålerenga general manager. He had not gone into the matter yesterday.

Editorial Director Thue told the newspaper that the channel often feel that coaches do not like topics they take up.

– But it is we who put premises for the broadcasts, not the coaches. Here it was revealed to Anne that there was a history between Rekdal and Bakke. She noticed even before the question was asked that Rekdal was tired of talking about it. But when it has been so strong representations from Rekdal – both Bakke and about Sogndal – it was relevant to take it up in front of such a struggle, says Thue.

SET THIS ? Eggen butcher Høgmo series change- rumblings

Press Association: – Must have a pretty high threshold

Legal adviser of the Norwegian Press Association, Kristine Foss, have not seen the actual situation, but comes with general considerations as VG recounting the situation.

– As a journalist you have to endure some untimely comments. One can say that it is bad style to answer such, but as a journalist should have a pretty high threshold for what you can tolerate that the interviewees are saying, according to Foss.

She recalls that it is allowed to flow that journalism is bad unless it really is.

– Many believe that certain issues should be left, even though there are good reasons why exactly these questions must be asked, she says in general terms.