LILLESTRØM (Dagbladet): The accused in the trial against sprinter Jaysuma Ndure admitted Thursday when the trial resumed that she had started a treatment for blemishes. The so-called “Dracula method.”
The trial against sprinter Jaysuma Ndure was canceled on January 28 because of confusion about this cosmetic treatment.
A method which involves penetration of the skin with small needles before dressing procedure with his own blood plasma. And that can provoke red marks. The victim had marks on his neck that night Ndure was arrested for violence against his former girlfriend and roommate on 8 November 2014.
A forensic pathologist had examined the aggrieved party. Competent testified before the trial was interrupted. He believed the marks on the neck of the aggrieved party could have been provoked by rough crushing of hands.
Before the trial was aborted had both the victim and her mother told aggrieved not had intended to carry out the treatment.
Now told aggrieved that she still had started treatment. But it was quickly canceled.
The victim denies that the treatment was performed on the neck, only in the face.
– I canceled because it was so painful, explained aggrieved in court Thursday .
the doctor who performed the treatment was not possible to come by for the diploma in the previous straight round.
approached clinic
Defender Mette Yvonne Larsen drove aggrieved hard that she had gone to the clinic the same day that the trial was postponed on January 28.
the victim alleged that she was not aware that the case had been postponed. She had left the courtroom earlier in the day due to a illlebefinnende. Larsen confronted aggrieved if she did not think it was odd to see a clinic and doctor for whom treatment the same day as the court was postponed.
– There was no one who had obtained this doctor to testify in case. That was what I signed. I did not mean there was something strange in attempting to get in touch with your doctor. I was better after receiving treatment at the emergency department and Codeine (prescription painkiller editor.) Home with me. And since the clinic was located right next to where I live, so I took a walk, said the aggrieved party.
The victim claimed that the purpose had not been trying to get the doctor to change their statements.
Moras explanation
Mother of aggrieved have explained previously in court about the cosmetic treatment, called Dracula method. She had to appear in court again on Thursday.
The last time she told that the victim was with her to the clinic in conjunction with that she herself would undertake processing. And her daughter just got smeared blood beyond the face of photography for promotional purposes for the clinic.
Yesterday she told that the victim had refused to continue treatment because it was so painful. She said that the doctor had instead proposed to smear blood beyond the face of the aggrieved, then take pictures of her.
She claimed that it was a spontaneous choice then and there. Daughter also should take the treatment.
– This was done. I even took pictures with doctor Ipad. I saw one of these images in the Look And Listen, told the witness.
Both mother and daughter are reported to the police by the defense to Ndure for having prepared a false statement in court.
She went further than in previous witnesses about her daughter’s treatment. Then she explained that the victim did not receive treatment. That blood was only smeared relative to a photographic event.
– It’s not perjury. I’d do it again. I take care of my daughter. She carried no treatment, said the witness.
Defender Mette Yvonne Larsen confronted testified that she previously had alleged that the victim did not take the treatment. That it was only in advertising. That it was intended that she should have no treatment.
Larsen says that the doctor has said in interviews that this version does not match at all.
– I have nothing to do with the credibility of this doctor to do, the witness answered.
the doctor is summoned and to testify later.
Bits Award
Ndure had a bite mark that was discovered a few days after his arrest. Lawyer Mette Yvonne Larsen said in court that the teeth of the victim had been investigated in relation to the bite mark defendants had on their backs.
– There are several similarities that examines pointed out, among others, your canines, said Larsen.
the victim did not want to comment on this.
– Are you aware of what it means not to tell the truth in court, pointed lawyer Larsen repeatedly.
the victim confirmed that it involved criminal liability.
During a break in the court did not want the prosecutor to comment that the victim and the witness had changed his explanations.
No comments:
Post a Comment